1 Now one Sabbath when Jesus went to dine at the house of a leader of the Pharisees, they were watching him closely.2 There right in front of him was a man whose body was swollen with fluid.3 So Jesus asked the experts in religious law and the Pharisees, "Is it lawful to heal on the Sabbath or not?"4 But they remained silent. So Jesus took hold of the man, healed him, and sent him away.5 Then he said to them, "Which of you, if you have a son or an ox that has fallen into a well on a Sabbath day, will not immediately pull him out?"6 But they could not reply to this.
- The setting is a meal at the home of a prominent Pharisee, indicating Jesus still engaged with religious leaders despite growing conflict.
- "Watching him closely" suggests scrutiny and potential hostility, setting a tense atmosphere (Luke 14:1).
- The man with edema (dropsy) was likely placed there deliberately to test Jesus regarding Sabbath observance.
- Jesus proactively addresses the legal experts, putting the burden of interpretation on them (Luke 14:3).
- Their silence reveals their inability or unwillingness to answer, caught between the law's perceived restrictions and human compassion (Luke 14:4).
- Jesus acts decisively, healing the man and demonstrating compassion over rigid legalism.
- His counter-question uses an argument from lesser to greater (a fortiori): If one would rescue an animal or child on the Sabbath, how much more a human being made in God's image? (Luke 14:5). This is a common rabbinic argument style.
- The argument appeals to common sense and accepted practice, highlighting the hypocrisy of their potential objections.
- Their inability to reply signifies the strength of Jesus' reasoning and exposes their flawed priorities (Luke 14:6).
- This incident again underscores the conflict between Jesus' understanding of the Sabbath (for human well-being) and the Pharisees' interpretation (strict prohibition of 'work').