1 Jesus was going through the grain fields on a Sabbath, and his disciples picked some heads of wheat, rubbed them in their hands, and ate them.2 But some of the Pharisees said, "Why are you doing what is against the law on the Sabbath?"3 Jesus answered them, "Haven't you read what David did when he and his companions were hungry-4 how he entered the house of God, took and ate the sacred bread, which is not lawful for any to eat but the priests alone, and gave it to his companions?"5 Then he said to them, "The Son of Man is lord of the Sabbath."
- This incident highlights the growing conflict between Jesus and the Pharisees over the interpretation of Sabbath law.
- The disciples' action of picking and eating grain was considered "reaping" and "threshing" by strict Pharisaic interpretation, thus violating Sabbath work prohibitions (based on Exodus 34:21).
- Jesus defends his disciples by appealing to Scripture, specifically the precedent set by David in 1 Samuel 21:1-6.
- David's actions, though technically violating ceremonial law (Leviticus 24:5-9), were justified by human need, implying that human need can take precedence over ritual regulations.
- Jesus' argument implies that the Pharisees' interpretation missed the spirit and purpose of the Sabbath law, which was intended for rest and refreshment, not burdensome restriction.
- The climax is Jesus' declaration in Luke 6:5: "{{The Son of Man is lord of the Sabbath}}." This is a claim of divine authority, suggesting He has the right to interpret and define the Sabbath's true meaning.
- This event establishes a key theme in Luke: Jesus' authority challenges and supersedes rigid religious traditions when they conflict with God's compassionate purposes.
- The Pharisees' focus was on the minutiae of the law, while Jesus focused on the underlying principles of mercy and human well-being.