The Bullet Point Bible

Mark 12

Parable of the Wicked Tenants

1 Then he began to speak to them in parables: "A man planted a vineyard. He put a fence around it, dug a pit for its winepress, and built a watchtower. Then he leased it to tenant farmers and went on a journey.2 At harvest time he sent a slave to the tenants to collect from them his portion of the crop.3 But those tenants seized his slave, beat him, and sent him away empty-handed.4 So he sent another slave to them again. This one they struck on the head and treated outrageously.5 He sent another, and that one they killed. This happened to many others, some of whom were beaten, others killed.6 He had one left, his one dear son. Finally he sent him to them, saying, 'They will respect my son.'7 But those tenants said to one another, 'This is the heir. Come, let's kill him and the inheritance will be ours!'8 So they seized him, killed him, and threw his body out of the vineyard.9 What then will the owner of the vineyard do? He will come and destroy those tenants and give the vineyard to others.10 Have you not read this scripture:10 ' The stone the builders rejected has become the cornerstone.11 This is from the Lord, and it is marvelous in our eyes '?"

  • This parable serves as an allegory for God's relationship with Israel and its leaders. The owner represents God, the vineyard Israel, the tenants the religious leaders, the servants the prophets, and the son Jesus Christ.
  • The repeated rejection and violence against the owner's servants mirrors Israel's historical rejection of God's prophets (see Nehemiah 9:26, Jeremiah 7:25-26).
  • The tenants' desire to seize the inheritance by killing the son reflects the religious leaders' motive to maintain their power and reject Jesus' authority.
  • The killing of the son outside the vineyard foreshadows Jesus' crucifixion outside the city walls of Jerusalem (Hebrews 13:12).
  • Jesus predicts judgment upon the unfaithful leaders ("destroy those tenants") and the transfer of God's kingdom blessings ("give the vineyard to others"), hinting at the inclusion of Gentiles or a new community of faith.
  • Jesus applies Psalm 118:22-23 to himself, identifying himself as the rejected stone who becomes the essential cornerstone of God's new work. This passage was associated with the Messiah.
  • The leaders understood the parable's indictment against them but were restrained from immediate action by Jesus' popularity with the crowds in Jerusalem during the Passover week.
  • The parable highlights themes of rejection, judgment, God's patience, God's ultimate authority, and the establishment of a new covenant people through Christ.
Paying Taxes to Caesar

13 Then they sent some of the Pharisees and Herodians to trap him with his own words.14 When they came they said to him, "Teacher, we know that you are truthful and do not court anyone's favor, because you show no partiality but teach the way of God in accordance with the truth. Is it right to pay taxes to Caesar or not? Should we pay or shouldn't we?"15 But he saw through their hypocrisy and said to them, "Why are you testing me? Bring me a denarius and let me look at it."16 So they brought one, and he said to them, "Whose image is this, and whose inscription?" They replied, Caesar's.17 Then Jesus said to them, "Give to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's." And they were utterly amazed at him.

  • The Pharisees (religious purists often resistant to Rome) and Herodians (supporters of Herod and Roman rule) form an unusual alliance, united only by their desire to discredit Jesus.
  • Their question about taxes was a carefully crafted trap: answering "yes" would alienate nationalistic Jews, while answering "no" would be grounds for charges of sedition against Rome.
  • The flattery used ("truthful," "show no partiality") was insincere, designed to pressure Jesus into a direct answer.
  • Jesus exposes their hypocrisy ("Why are you testing me?") before addressing the question.
  • By asking for a denarius (a Roman coin bearing Caesar's image and inscription, likely Tiberius), Jesus shifts the focus to the coin itself. Roman coins were considered offensive by some Jews due to the emperor's image and divine titles.
  • Jesus' response, "{{Give back to Caesar the things that are Caesar's}}", acknowledges the legitimacy of civil government and its claims (like taxes), as symbolized by the coin belonging to Caesar. See also Romans 13:1-7.
  • The second part, "{{and to God the things that are God's}}", establishes a higher allegiance. Since humans are made in God's image (Genesis 1:27), they owe their ultimate loyalty and very selves to God.
  • Jesus brilliantly avoids the trap, affirms obligations to both earthly and divine authorities in their proper spheres, and leaves his questioners "utterly amazed."
  • This teaching provides a foundational principle for Christians navigating their relationship with secular governments.
Marriage and the Resurrection

18 Sadducees (who say there is no resurrection) also came to him and asked him,19 "Teacher, Moses wrote for us: ' If a man's brother dies and leaves a wife but no children, that man must marrythe widow and father childrenfor his brother .'20 There were seven brothers. The first one married, and when he died he had no children.21 The second married her and died without any children, and likewise the third.22 None of the seven had children. Finally, the woman died too.23 In the resurrection, when they rise again, whose wife will she be? For all seven had married her."24 Jesus said to them, "Aren't you deceived for this reason, because you don't know the scriptures or the power of God?25 For when they rise from the dead, they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are like angels in heaven.26 Now as for the dead being raised, have you not read in the book of Moses, in the passage about the bush, how God said to him, ' I am the God of Abraham, theGod of Isaac, and the God of Jacob '?27 He is not the God of the dead but of the living. You are badly mistaken!"

  • The Sadducees were a priestly, aristocratic group who accepted only the Torah (first five books of Moses) as authoritative and denied the resurrection, angels, and spirits (Acts 23:8).
  • They present a hypothetical scenario based on the Levirate marriage law (Deuteronomy 25:5-6) designed to make the concept of resurrection seem absurd.
  • Jesus pinpoints their fundamental errors: ignorance of the Scriptures (even the Torah they claimed to uphold) and the transformative power of God.
  • He clarifies that the nature of existence after the resurrection will be different; human relationships like marriage will not continue in the same form, and resurrected beings will be "like angels." This doesn't mean humans become angels, but that their mode of existence changes.
  • Jesus proves the resurrection from the Torah itself, the portion of Scripture the Sadducees accepted. He quotes Exodus 3:6, where God identifies Himself to Moses in the present tense ("{{I am...}}") as the God of patriarchs who had died centuries earlier.
  • The logic is that God would not identify Himself as the God of those who ceased to exist; His ongoing relationship with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob implies their continued existence and future resurrection.
  • Jesus concludes with a strong rebuke ("{{You are badly mistaken!}}"), emphasizing the seriousness of their theological error.
  • This passage affirms the reality of the resurrection and reveals that eternal life transcends earthly institutions like marriage.
The Greatest Commandment

28 Now one of the experts in the law came and heard them debating. When he saw that Jesus answered them well, he asked him, "Which commandment is the most important of all?"29 Jesus answered, "The most important is: ' Listen, Israel, the Lord our God, the Lord is one .30 Lovethe Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, with all your mind, and with all your strength .'31 The second is: ' Love your neighbor as yourself .' There is no other commandment greater than these."32 The expert in the law said to him, "That is true, Teacher; you are right to say that he is one, and there is no one else besides him .33 And to love him with all your heart, with all your mind, and with all your strength and to love your neighbor as yourself is more important than all burnt offerings and sacrifices."34 When Jesus saw that he had answered thoughtfully, he said to him, "You are not far from the kingdom of God." Then no one dared any longer to question him.

  • Unlike the previous questioners, this scribe (expert in the Law) seems sincere, impressed by Jesus' wisdom in handling the Sadducees.
  • Rabbis often debated the relative importance of the 613 commandments found in the Law; the scribe asks for the foundational principle.
  • Jesus quotes the Shema from Deuteronomy 6:4-5, the central affirmation of Jewish faith, emphasizing monotheism and the call to total love for God.
  • He uniquely pairs this with Leviticus 19:18, "{{Love your neighbor as yourself}}", elevating it to equal importance and summarizing the essence of the Law's requirements concerning human relationships.
  • Jesus presents these two commandments not just as primary, but as the foundation upon which all other commandments depend (see Matthew 22:40).
  • The scribe genuinely agrees and perceptively adds that this inward love for God and neighbor surpasses the importance of external religious rituals like sacrifices (echoing prophets like Hosea 6:6 and 1 Samuel 15:22).
  • Jesus commends the scribe's understanding, stating he is "{{not far from the kingdom of God}}", indicating spiritual proximity based on his grasp of true righteousness.
  • This exchange silences further challenges, demonstrating Jesus' definitive authority on the Law.
Whose Son is the Messiah?

35 While Jesus was teaching in the temple courts, he said, "How is it that the experts in the law say that the Christ is David's son?36 David himself, by the Holy Spirit, said,36 ' The Lord said to my lord,36 " Sit at my right hand,36 until I put your enemies under your feet ."'

  • Jesus now shifts from answering questions to posing one, challenging the common understanding of the Messiah's identity while teaching in the Temple.
  • The scribes correctly taught that the Messiah (Christ) would be a descendant of King David (Son of David), based on prophecies like 2 Samuel 7:12-16.
  • Jesus quotes Psalm 110:1, a psalm widely accepted by Jews as Messianic and attributed to David.
  • In this Psalm, David refers to two distinct "Lords." The first "Lord" (YHWH, God the Father) speaks to David's "Lord" (Adonai, referring to the Messiah).
  • The crucial point: David, the great king, calls his own descendant "Lord," acknowledging the Messiah's superior status and authority.
  • Jesus' question, "{{How then can he be his son?}}", highlights a paradox: How can the Messiah be both David's descendant (son) and David's superior (Lord)?
  • This implies that the Messiah must be more than just a human descendant of David; He must possess a higher, divine nature. It points towards the doctrine of Christ's dual nature as both human and divine.
  • The crowd's positive reception ("listening to him with delight") contrasts with the leaders' hostility and suggests Jesus' teaching resonated with the people.
Warning Against the Scribes

38 In his teaching Jesus also said, "Watch out for the experts in the law. They like walking around in long robes and elaborate greetings in the marketplaces,39 and the best seats in the synagogues and the places of honor at banquets.40 They devour widows' property, and as a show make long prayers. These men will receive a more severe punishment."

  • Following the theological question about the Messiah, Jesus issues a direct ethical warning against the hypocrisy of many religious leaders (scribes/experts in the law).
  • He criticizes their love for outward appearances and public recognition: distinctive clothing ("long robes"), respectful greetings, prominent positions in religious gatherings ("best seats"), and social events ("places of honor").
  • The core indictment is the stark contrast between their pious exterior and their exploitative behavior: "{{They devour widows' houses}}". This likely refers to mismanagement of estates entrusted to them or pressuring vulnerable widows for donations.
  • Their lengthy prayers are condemned as being "for show" (prophasei, meaning 'pretense' or 'outward show'), masking their greed and injustice.
  • Jesus warns that their hypocrisy, especially abusing their religious position for personal gain and exploiting the vulnerable, will lead to a "{{harsher judgment}}". Accountability is proportionate to position and knowledge.
  • This serves as a warning to all religious leaders and followers against pride, hypocrisy, and the abuse of position.
The Widow's Offering

41 Then he sat down opposite the offering box, and watched the crowd putting coins into it. Many rich people were throwing in large amounts.42 And a poor widow came and put in two small copper coins, worth less than a penny.43 He called his disciples and said to them, "I tell you the truth, this poor widow has put more into the offering box than all the others.44 For they all gave out of their wealth. But she, out of her poverty, put in what she had to live on, everything she had."

  • The setting is the Court of Women in the Temple, where thirteen trumpet-shaped offering receptacles ("offering box") were located.
  • Jesus observes the giving patterns: many wealthy individuals contribute large amounts, making a visible show of their generosity.
  • In contrast, a poor widow contributes two "lepta," the smallest value Jewish coins available. Mark helpfully equates this to a Roman "kodrantes" (Latin: quadrans), emphasizing its minuscule monetary worth ("less than a penny").
  • Jesus uses this moment to teach his disciples about the true nature of giving in God's eyes.
  • He declares that the widow's tiny offering was greater than all the large sums given by the rich.
  • The principle: God measures giving not by the amount given, but by the degree of sacrifice involved and the attitude of the heart. The rich gave from their surplus ("out of their wealth"), while the widow gave sacrificially ("out of her poverty, put in everything she had").
  • Her gift represented total trust in God, as she gave "all she had to live on."
  • This episode provides a stark contrast to the greed of the scribes condemned in the previous verses and exemplifies the humble, sacrificial devotion valued in God's kingdom. It highlights kingdom economics where the last are first.

The Scriptures quoted are from the NET Bible® https://netbible.org copyright ©1996, 2019 used with permission from Biblical Studies Press, L.L.C. All rights reserved

To see the NET Bible® study tool go to https://netbible.org.