Bullet Point Bible

Ministry in Thessalonica

¹ After they traveled through Amphipolis and Apollonia, they came to Thessalonica, where there was a Jewish synagogue.² Paul went to the Jews in the synagogue, as he customarily did, and on three Sabbath days he addressed them from the scriptures,³ explaining and demonstrating that the Christ had to suffer and to rise from the dead, saying, "This Jesus I am proclaiming to you is the Christ."⁴ Some of them were persuaded and joined Paul and Silas, along with a large group of God-fearing Greeks and quite a few prominent women.

Paul follows his established missionary strategy of first visiting the local synagogue in major cities (Acts 17:2; cf. Acts 13:5, 14; 14:1). Thessalonica was a strategic major city and capital of the Roman province of Macedonia.
Paul's preaching centered on demonstrating from the Old Testament scriptures that the Messiah's suffering, death, and resurrection were divinely ordained (Acts 17:3; cf. Luke 24:26-27, 46).
The core message was the identification of Jesus of Nazareth as the promised Messiah ("Christ") (Acts 17:3).
Paul's reasoning ("dialegomai" in Greek, Acts 17:2) involved interactive discussion and logical argumentation based on scripture.
The initial converts included Jews, "God-fearing" Gentiles (non-Jews who were attracted to Judaism and worshiped God but hadn't fully converted), and influential women (Acts 17:4).
The inclusion of "prominent women" highlights the significant role women played in the early church and their social standing in Macedonian society, which was known for granting women more freedom than other parts of the Greco-Roman world.
This successful ministry laid the foundation for the church to whom Paul would later write 1 and 2 Thessalonians.

Opposition and Uproar in Thessalonica

⁵ But the Jews became jealous, and gathering together some worthless men from the rabble in the marketplace, they formed a mob and set the city in an uproar. They attacked Jason's house, trying to find Paul and Silas to bring them out to the assembly.⁶ When they did not find them, they dragged Jason and some of the brothers before the city officials, screaming, "These people who have stirred up trouble throughout the world have come here too,⁷ and Jason has welcomed them as guests! They are all acting against Caesar's decrees, saying there is another king named Jesus!"⁸ They caused confusion among the crowd and the city officials who heard these things.⁹ After the city officials had received bail from Jason and the others, they released them.

Opposition arose primarily from jealousy among some Jews who rejected Paul's message (Acts 17:5), a recurring theme in Acts (cf. Acts 13:45).
The opponents used disreputable individuals ("worthless men from the marketplace") to incite mob violence, demonstrating the unscrupulous tactics used against the early Christians (Acts 17:5).
The accusation "These people who have stirred up trouble throughout the world" (Acts 17:6) indicates the growing impact and reputation of the Christian movement across the Roman Empire.
The charge that Christians acted "against Caesar's decrees, saying there is another king, Jesus" (Acts 17:7) was a serious political accusation of treason (sedition), twisting the spiritual concept of Jesus' kingship into a direct challenge to Roman authority.
Jason, Paul's host, and other believers faced persecution for their association with the missionaries (Acts 17:6-7). This highlights the risks involved in supporting the Christian mission.
The city officials ("politarchs," a specific title used in Thessalonica, confirmed by archaeology) acted relatively cautiously, requiring bail (a pledge or security) from Jason rather than immediately punishing him (Acts 17:8-9). This suggests they may have recognized the charges were likely motivated by religious conflict rather than genuine political threat.

Ministry in Berea

¹⁰ The brothers sent Paul and Silas off to Berea at once, during the night. When they arrived, they went to the Jewish synagogue.¹¹ These Jews were more open-minded than those in Thessalonica, for they eagerly received the message, examining the scriptures carefully every day to see if these things were so.¹² Therefore many of them believed, along with quite a few prominent Greek women and men.

Paul and Silas were quickly sent away by night for their safety, demonstrating the believers' care and the ongoing danger (Acts 17:10).
In Berea, they again started their ministry in the synagogue (Acts 17:10).
The Berean Jews are commended for being "more open-minded" or "noble-minded" (Greek: *eugenesteroi*) than the Thessalonians (Acts 17:11). This nobility was demonstrated not by social status but by their attitude toward God's word.
Their nobility involved two key actions: eagerly receiving the message preached by Paul and diligently examining the Old Testament scriptures daily to verify Paul's claims about Jesus (Acts 17:11).
This passage provides a model for responsible engagement with teaching: openness combined with critical, scripture-based verification.
The positive response led to many conversions among both Jews and prominent Greeks (men and women), indicating the power of the gospel when met with receptive and discerning hearts (Acts 17:12).
The Berean example encourages believers today to engage deeply and critically with scripture, testing all teaching against its standard.

Flight from Berea to Athens

¹³ But when the Jews from Thessalonica heard that Paul had also proclaimed the word of God in Berea, they came there too, inciting and disturbing the crowds.¹⁴ Then the brothers sent Paul away to the coast at once, but Silas and Timothy remained in Berea.¹⁵ Those who accompanied Paul escorted him as far as Athens, and after receiving an order for Silas and Timothy to come to him as soon as possible, they left.

The persistent opposition from Thessalonian Jews followed Paul to Berea, demonstrating their determined hostility (Acts 17:13).
Once again, agitators stirred up trouble among the crowds, forcing Paul to leave for his safety (Acts 17:13-14).
Paul was escorted by believers to Athens, indicating both the danger he faced and the care provided by the church community (Acts 17:14-15). Athens was a significant cultural and intellectual center, though past its political prime.
Silas and Timothy stayed temporarily in Berea, likely to consolidate the new church there, but Paul requested they rejoin him quickly in Athens (Acts 17:14-15). This highlights Paul's reliance on his missionary team.
This pattern of preaching, conversion, opposition, and forced departure is characteristic of Paul's missionary journeys as recorded in Acts.

Paul's Distress and Engagement in Athens

¹⁶ While Paul was waiting for them in Athens, his spirit was greatly upset because he saw the city was full of idols.¹⁷ So he was addressing the Jews and the God-fearing Gentiles in the synagogue, and in the marketplace every day those who happened to be there.¹⁸ Also some of the Epicurean and Stoic philosophers were conversing with him, and some were asking, "What does this foolish babbler want to say?" Others said, "He seems to be a proclaimer of foreign gods." (They said this because he was proclaiming the good news about Jesus and the resurrection.)¹⁹ So they took Paul and brought him to the Areopagus, saying, "May we know what this new teaching is that you are proclaiming?²⁰ For you are bringing some surprising things to our ears, so we want to know what they mean."²¹ (All the Athenians and the foreigners who lived there used to spend their time in nothing else than telling or listening to something new.)

Paul's deep distress ("paroxyneto," provoked or stirred) over Athenian idolatry reveals his strong monotheistic convictions and concern for God's honor (Acts 17:16). Athens was renowned for its multitude of temples and statues.
Paul engaged in ministry in two primary locations: the synagogue (with Jews and God-fearers) and the Agora (marketplace), the center of public life, debating with anyone present (Acts 17:17).
He encountered Epicurean and Stoic philosophers, representing major schools of Greek thought (Acts 17:18). Epicureans generally believed gods were detached from the world and sought pleasure (tranquility) as the highest good. Stoics emphasized reason, virtue, fate, and living in accordance with nature, often with pantheistic leanings.
Some philosophers dismissively called Paul a "scavenger of tidbits" (Greek: *spermologos*), implying he was picking up scraps of ideas without a coherent philosophy (Acts 17:18).
Others perceived him as promoting "foreign gods" because he spoke of "Jesus" and "resurrection" (*anastasis*), which they may have mistaken for a pair of deities (Acts 17:18). The resurrection was a particularly alien concept to Greek philosophy.
Curiosity led them to bring Paul to the Areopagus (Mars Hill), either the council itself or the location where it met, a place associated with serious discussion of religion and philosophy (Acts 17:19).
Luke adds an editorial note characterizing Athenians' intellectual curiosity and love for novelty (Acts 17:21), setting the stage for Paul's address.

Paul's Address on the Areopagus: God the Creator

²² So Paul stood before the Areopagus and said, "Men of Athens, I see that you are very religious in all respects.²³ For as I went around and observed closely your objects of worship, I even found an altar with this inscription: 'To an unknown god.' Therefore what you worship without knowing it, this I proclaim to you.²⁴ The God who made the world and everything in it, who is Lord of heaven and earth, does not live in temples made by human hands,²⁵ nor is he served by human hands, as if he needed anything, because he himself gives life and breath and everything to everyone.²⁶ From one man he made every nation of the human race to inhabit the entire earth, determining their set times and the fixed limits of the places where they would live,²⁷ so that they would search for God and perhaps grope around for him and find him, though he is not far from each one of us.²⁸ For in him we live and move about and exist, as even some of your own poets have said, 'For we too are his offspring.'²⁹ So since we are God's offspring, we should not think the deity is like gold or silver or stone, an image made by human skill and imagination.

Paul begins his speech by acknowledging the Athenians' religiosity, using a respectful and culturally sensitive approach (Acts 17:22). The term *deisidaimonesterous* can mean "religious" or "superstitious"; Paul likely intended the more positive sense here.
He uses an altar "To an unknown god" as a point of contact, suggesting their worship, while extensive, was incomplete (Acts 17:23). Such altars existed, perhaps erected to ensure no deity was inadvertently offended.
Paul identifies this "unknown god" as the one true God, the Creator of all things (Acts 17:24; cf. Genesis 1:1). This contrasts sharply with pagan polytheism and idols.
He emphasizes God's transcendence and self-sufficiency: God is Lord of heaven and earth, does not dwell in man-made temples (cf. 1 Kings 8:27; Isaiah 66:1), and does not need human service (Acts 17:24-25). This directly challenges the assumptions behind idol worship and temple rituals.
God is presented as the source of all life and sustenance (Acts 17:25).
Paul affirms the unity of humanity, descended from one ancestor (Adam), and God's sovereignty over history and geography, arranging nations' times and boundaries (Acts 17:26; cf. Deuteronomy 32:8).
God's purpose in this arrangement is that humanity might seek and find Him (Acts 17:27). God's immanence is stressed: "he is not far from each one of us."
Paul quotes Greek poets (likely Epimenides and Aratus) to support his point that humans have a relationship with and dependence on God ("For in him we live and move and have our being," "For we too are his offspring") (Acts 17:28). This demonstrates his familiarity with their culture and uses their own sources to argue his case.
The logical conclusion is that if humans are God's offspring, the divine nature cannot be represented by inanimate idols crafted by humans (Acts 17:29). This critiques idolatry using reasoning familiar to his philosophical audience.

Paul's Address on the Areopagus: Call to Repentance

³⁰ Therefore, although God has overlooked such times of ignorance, he now commands all people everywhere to repent,³¹ because he has set a day on which he is going to judge the world in righteousness, by a man whom he designated, having provided proof to everyone by raising him from the dead."

Paul transitions from describing God's nature to declaring God's command. God previously "overlooked" the "times of ignorance" regarding His true nature (Acts 17:30), showing divine patience.
However, with the coming of Christ, God now universally commands repentance (a change of mind and direction) from idolatry and sin (Acts 17:30). This call is urgent and applies to "all people everywhere."
The basis for this command is future judgment: God has appointed a day to judge the world righteously (Acts 17:31; cf. Psalm 96:13).
This judgment will be executed through a specific man designated by God – Jesus Christ (Acts 17:31; cf. John 5:22, 27; Acts 10:42).
The ultimate proof (*pistis*) of Jesus' identity and authority as judge is His resurrection from the dead (Acts 17:31). The resurrection validates Jesus' claims and guarantees the future judgment.
This conclusion brings the focus squarely onto Jesus Christ and the resurrection, the core elements of the Christian gospel that were often stumbling blocks for both Jewish and Greek audiences.

Varied Responses in Athens

³² Now when they heard about the resurrection from the dead, some began to scoff, but others said, "We will hear you again about this."³³ So Paul left the Areopagus.³⁴ But some people joined him and believed. Among them were Dionysius, who was a member of the Areopagus, a woman named Damaris, and others with them.

The mention of the resurrection of the dead provoked immediate and mixed reactions, as it clashed significantly with Greek philosophical views about death and the afterlife (Acts 17:32). Many Greeks believed in the immortality of the soul but considered the resurrection of the body nonsensical or undesirable.
Some listeners openly mocked or scoffed at the idea (Acts 17:32).
Others expressed polite interest or perhaps delayed decision, wanting to hear more later (Acts 17:32).
Paul concluded his address and departed from the council (Acts 17:33). The overall response in Athens appears less successful numerically compared to Thessalonica or Berea.
Despite the mixed reception, some individuals did believe and attach themselves to Paul (Acts 17:34).
Luke specifically names Dionysius, a member of the prestigious Areopagus council itself, and a woman named Damaris (Acts 17:34). Their conversions, though perhaps few, demonstrate that the gospel could penetrate even the intellectual and cultural elite of Athens.
The Athenian episode illustrates the challenge of contextualizing the gospel in a highly philosophical culture and the varied ways people respond to the Christian message, particularly the doctrine of the resurrection.

The Bullet Point Bible

Acts 17